Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Background Check Edition

It's the first full week of January and I'm still working on getting back into the routine.  Being out of the office a couple days this week in trial has pushed things back, however.  With that being said, I did read through several articles this week that were quite good, namely on background checks.  In particular, the one on potential FCRA Background Check Class Actions was one of the more thought provoking reads and the one that I wanted to highlight up top.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Beware of Potential FCRA Background Check Class Actions

Gregory Snell has a good note on the increased number of FCRA background check class actions that have arisen over the past year (the number of class actions more than tripled in 2014).  Snell does a good job pointing out the correct procedure that employers must follow to comply with the FCRA and using background checks in the hiring process.  As well, my favorite part was the inclusion at the end of the article on steps employers can take to be proactive about the situation and reduce potential exposure to FCRA background check claims.



Oftentimes, applicants are hesitant when background checks are brought up.  Even if the applicant has a clean record, background checks are a source of confusion, frustration, and stress.  This particular link is to the actual background check guide for job applicants.  I think the guide does a good job breaking down the process, what applicants can expect, and what applicants can do if they think the background check was discriminatory.



This publication is a nice tie in with Snell's article on background check class actions, listed above.  The EEOC and FTC put out a publication on what employers need to be aware of in regard to background checks.  Both the EEOC and FTC have guidance on what an employer can legally do before a background check and also once the background information is collected.  This is definitely worth a read for employers and those interested in the background check process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...