Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Even though I often see a lot of articles on smartphones in the workplace, I came across a very good article recently that I wanted to highlight.  Remember employers, you cannot have it both ways.  You cannot require (explicitly or not) that nonexempt employees check their smartphones for work related activities off the clock and then assume these employees are potentially not entitled to compensation for this extra time worked.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Employers: Regroup for the New Year on Union Avoidance Strategies

Even though we are already a few weeks into 2015, it is never too late for employers to re-examine their union avoidance strategies (especially in light of the recent NLRB rulings that allow access to employer e-mail systems for union organization as well as the new "quickie election" rules).   This is one of the better written articles that I have seen on union avoidance recently and one that employers should review.  In particular, pay close attention to the suggestions on what employers can do to implement new strategies to combat unions in the workplace.


Employer Protocol for Weather Closures & Delays

Even though the article is titled "Is Your Organization Ready for Another Northeast Ohio Winter?", this is a good read for employers and employees everywhere.  The article has three thoughts that a proactive employer should consider and address for the inevitable work closure or delay because of weather.  This is certainly worth a review, even if to just confirm that there is a protocol in place to deal with these types of situations.


Are Smartphones a Pending Wage & Hour Violation Issue?

Tammy Binford has a very good article that calls attention to the potential wage & hour issues that employers could face from nonexempt employees checking their smartphones off the clock.  Many nonexempt employees have smartphones that enable them to access work e-mails (and take work phone calls) after they clock out.  Even if these employees are not required to use their smartphones for work once they clock out, many still do.  That creates potential wage & hour violations that employers could be liable for...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...