Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Game Over, (One) Oakland Raiders Cheerleader Lawsuit Settles


For those keeping track at home, back in January, a lawsuit was filed by a former Oakland Raiders cheerleader who alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") as a result of several wage and hour violations by the Raiders.  (Oakland Raiders Lawsuit Blog).  Since that first lawsuit, several other lawsuits have been brought by current and former N.F.L. cheerleaders against several teams and have alleged similar wage and hour violations.  I have followed these lawsuits with keen interest, but this first one really stood out as it was, in essence, the template for all future cheerleader wage and hour suits.

Well, after several months of litigation, this case has finally settled and the Raiders have agreed to pay $1.25 million.  In addition to that settlement amount, additional provisions were provided for:  

  • Instead of earning $125/game in a single paycheck delivered at the end of the season, the cheerleaders will now earn $9/hour, plus overtime, and will be paid every two weeks.  As a result, the annual compensation will rise from $1,250 to about $3,200 for each cheerleader.  Note, that back in July, the Raiders quietly raised their cheerleaders' pay for the upcoming season to $9/hour.  (Raiders Raise Pay for Cheerleaders Blog).  
  • Cheerleaders will now be reimbursed for business expenses and mileage.  Before the settlement, these costs were covered solely by the cheerleaders
  • The Raiders will no longer illegally deduct wages for minor rules infractions such as showing up a few minutes late, wearing the wrong color nail polish, bringing the wrong pom poms to practice, etc.
  • Cheerleaders will be allowed a 10 minute break during games.

At this point, it is not clear what impact this settlement will have on the other N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuits, let alone the second cheerleader lawsuit filed against the Raiders.  In any event, this is a big win for the cheerleaders who brought the suit and potentially a bit of foreshadowing on how some of the other cases will play out, if they do in fact end up settling as well.


Additional information on the settlement can be found in the LA Times article:  http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-raiders-settle-cheerleader-lawsuit-20140904-column.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more