Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Coats v. Dish Network, L.L.C., Colorado Supreme Court


As with many employment and labor law related cases that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  A quadriplegic man, Brandon Coats, lost his job at Dish Network after being fired for failing a random drug test as a result of off-the-job medical marijuana use.  Coats claimed he used marijuana to control muscle spasms which resulted from a car accident that left him wheelchair bound.  After being fired, Coats subsequently brought suit against Dish and claimed he had been unlawfully fired as the marijuana use was legal under Colorado state law and that he was never impaired while on the job. 

Looking Back:  The trial court upheld the firing and Coats appealed.  The Colorado Court of Appeals panel affirmed the lower court's ruling and held the firing of Coats was lawful since marijuana is illegal under federal law, employees have no protection to use it anytime they want. 

It is important to note here that Colorado prohibits an employer from firing an employee for lawful off duty conduct, referred to as the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute.  As a result, Coats' argument that even though he tested positive for marijuana, he should be protected from being terminated, could in essence prevail so long as the drug use occurred during non-working hours (which what appears to have happened here).  However, the Court of Appeals noted that nothing illegal under federal law can be considered "lawful" under the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute.  Consequently, any reliance upon the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute proved to be unfounded.

The Main Issue:  Does the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute protect an employee's right to use marijuana off the clock in a state that lawfully permits marijuana usage and not be subjected to being fired for failing a drug test, even if that drug usage violates federal law? 

Lower Court Opinion:  http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_Of_Appeals/Opinion/2013/12CA0595%20&%2012CA1704-PD.pdf

Current Status:  On January 27, 2014, the Colorado Supreme Court stated that it would review the lower court's opinion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more