Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Non-Compete Agreement Edition

It has been a busy week in trial, so I have not had a chance to read through as much as I would have liked.  With that being said, I found a few articles on one of my favorite employment law topics:  Non-Compete Agreements.  Each article has a different insight and look at non-competes...something for everyone.


The Wild Card in Non-Compete Cases: The Judge

For those of us who are litigators, most, if not all cases eventually turn on who the judge is and how things play out before him or her in court.  One of the partners at my firm says the outcome of every case depends upon what the judge had for breakfast that morning...I could not agree more.  This is a good article on a non-compete case that an attorney had before a particular judge and that judge's reaction to whether the terms of the restrictions in the non-compete were "reasonable".  



Non-compete agreements are one of my favorite legal topics.  I have written on the topic before and always enjoy when a case or well written article on the topic comes along.  This is one of those times.  This article has some thoughts that employees need to keep in mind before signing a non-compete agreement.  Even for those employees who do not have any questions or are confident they know what they are doing, would be wise to give this article a read through.


5 Attributes of Successful Non-Compete Agreements

This is a good article with five points on how successful non-compete agreements can be shaped.  Most of the five points are laid out with an eye towards possible litigation of non-competes, and how the non-competes can be drafted to avoid potential issues if contested in court.  It is always a good idea to check on what the non-compete laws are in each state before drafting (or signing) a non-compete.  In any event, this article is still on point and has some good ideas to keep in mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more