Skip to main content

NLRB: Who Said There's No Such Thing as a Free Lunch? Not So Fast; Protected Concerted Activity at Play


Gates & Sons Barbeque of Missouri, Inc. and Workers' Organizing Committee, Kansas City - NLRB


Facts:  Gates & Sons operated a chain of successful barbeque restaurants.  One of the benefits offered to its employees was a free meal, valued between six and ten dollars, each day an employee was scheduled to work.  The Gates & Sons location involved in this case was highly successful and its employees at the location enjoyed the free lunch benefit.

A Workers' Organizing Center (which are often affiliated with labor unions) entered the picture and used a tried and true labor tactic, a strike, in order to help the employees advocate for higher hourly pay.  Unlike a traditional labor strike called by a union in support of a collective bargaining demand, this was a one day strike by the workers.  Even though these workers were not represented by a union, they still have the right to engage in "concerted activities for...mutual aid or protection" under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act ("Act").  It is important to remember that in the absence of violence or other untoward conduct, strikers may not be punished or discharged for engaging in a strike.  Once the workers engaged in the one day strike in support of higher wages, they returned to work the following day.  However, Gates & Sons apparently eliminated the workers' free meal benefit. 

Holding:  The Administrative Law Judge held that Gates & Sons' decision to terminate the free meal benefits was a form of retaliation against the workers that engaged in the protected one day strike.  As a result, terminating the free meal benefit was in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act which prohibits employers from restraining, coercing, or interfering with the employees' right to engage in concerted protected activity.  Consequently, Gates & Sons was ordered to reinstate the free meal benefit and otherwise make the employees whole for any other losses they incurred as a result of the termination of the meal benefit.

Date:  June 17, 2014

Opinion:  http://www.nlrb.gov/case/14-CA-110229

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more