Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Employers Should Reevaluate Their Intern Programs

This is a helpful reminder for employers to reevaluate their intern programs to ensure that there are not any potential legal issues that could arise over the interns claiming they are actually employees and are therefore entitled to compensation.  The article provides a few points that employers should review in order to ensure they are in compliance with unpaid internship laws.  

Should Employers Monitor the Social Media Posts of Its Employees?

This Wall Street Journal article has a mini debate over whether employers should monitor the social media posts of its employees.  Given the increasing number of employees who use FaceBook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Pinterest, etc., concerns can arise over what these employees are actually posting.  Employer likely have a reason to be concerned about what the employees are posting, especially if it could impact the company's reputation, finances, etc.  However, it is important that employers do not go on a fishing expedition, combing through its employees' social media posts in the hopes of finding something offensive or that would warrant the employee being fired.


Are Employer Mandated "Anger Management" Sessions Compensable Time?

Bryan Symes has a good note on whether employers are required to compensate employees for time spent at mandatory anger management sessions.  In short, based upon a 2005 case that impacts employers in Wisconsin, Symes states that these mandatory counseling sessions are indeed compensable time for which employees are entitled to be paid.  This is a relatively short, but important note that employers and employees alike should take a few minutes to review.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more