Skip to main content

E-Cigarettes: Not Just Blowing Smoke, a Potential Issue For Employers



Over the past few years, the emergence of E-Cigarettes in the workplace has become more common.  The question that employers now face is how to handle employees that want to "vape" while at work.  Employees often argue that since E-Cigarettes are not technically "cigarettes" per se, they should be allowed to use them at work.  Other employees, often ones that do not use E-Cigarettes, complain that they should not be subjected to the E-Cigarettes, regardless of whether or not they are not as harmful as regular cigarettes.  The question then becomes how does a company deal with the use of E-Cigarettes?  However, not all companies agree on whether or not to allow their employees to use these E-Cigarettes:  Exxon Mobile and McDonalds allow it, while CVS, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart all prohibit their employees from vaping.

While many states ban smoking in the workplace, only three states (New Jersey, North Dakota, and Utah) have added E-Cigarettes to these anti-smoking in the workplace laws.  It is likely that as E-Cigarettes become more common, more states could also ban E-Cigarettes in the workplace. 

For the time being, however, it is often left up to the employer on whether to allow employees to use E-Cigarettes at work.  Although private employers generally have no latitude to dictate what an employee does outside of work, employers are able to decide what to allow or prohibit when an employee is at work (depending, of course, on what the laws in that particular state are regarding the topic).  If an employer decides to ban E-Cigarettes at work, it is best to have a clear and effective policy and give employees reasonable notice before implementing a policy.  As the law continues to develop on this front, it is important to keep an eye on what legislation is passed in each state. 


Special thanks to the Wall Street Journal for additional information on the topic:  http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303819704579320902677845732

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more