Skip to main content

Settlement Reached Over Anti-Union Tweets By Barstool Sports Founder


A few months ago, Barstool Sports and its founder, Dave Portnoy, came under fire after Portnoy tweeted several anti-union comments in regard to a possible unionization of the company.  (Barstool Sports is a sports and entertainment company with blogs, podcasts, and a short lived television show, among other ventures.)  In one of the tweets, Portnoy said he would fire any employee on the spot that talked to someone about unionizing the company.

Portnoy’s tweets drew the attention of Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who suggested that Portnoy had violated federal labor law by posting his anti-union tweets.  An unfair labor practices charge was subsequently filed with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and things had been relatively quiet since that point. 

However, it was recently reported that a settlement had been reached between the parties.  While the settlement did not include an acknowledgment that the company violated federal labor law, the company has agreed to notify its employees via email and physical posting of employees’ right to unionize.  As well, Portnoy will be required to delete his anti-union tweets and the company will take down a Barstool Sports Union account that was alleged to have been used to weed out which employees actually supported unionization.

Following the announced settlement, Representative Ocasio-Cortez tweeted “Reminder:  Threatening workers who want to unionize is illegal :)”


For additional information:  https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/barstool-sports-settles-with-labor-board-over-anti-union-tweets

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...