Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: H.B. 731-FN (New Hampshire)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Last Thursday, the New Hampshire House voted 212 - 155 to increase the hourly minimum wage rate in the state from $7.25/hour up to $15/hour by January 1, 2025.  In a somewhat surprising turn of events, Democratic members of the House overruled House leadership by supporting $2 more per hour in a pay hike than had been recommended by a House policy committee.  The legislation now moves over to the New Hampshire Senate for further deliberation and vote.  Should the Senate approve the bill, it would then head to Republican Governor Chris Sununu's desk for signature.

Readers might recall that the New Hampshire General Court (New Hampshire's Congress) had approved a bill last year that would have raised the state's hourly minimum wage rate to $10/hour in 2020 and $12/hour in 2022.  However, Governor Sununu vetoed that bill.  At this time, New Hampshire is the lone state in the New England region that remains at the federal minimum wage rate.  (Connecticut is currently at $10.10/hour; Rhode Island is currently at $10.50/hour; Vermont is currently at $10.78/hour; Maine is currently at $11/hour; New York State is currently at $11.80/hour, although some industries and regions in the state vary; and Massachusetts is currently at $12/hour.)

Will things turn out differently this year?  Perhaps.  There is at least one reason to think H.B. 731-FN will become law (or a compromise could be reached):  Governor Sununu is up for reelection this year in what many expect could be a highly contested race.  With minimum wage being a popular issue among Democrats and some Independents/swing voters in the state, might Governor Sununu feel pressure to sign off on a minimum wage hike to help his reelection chances in November?  Stay tuned.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more