Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


While I did not intend to only read through NLRB and union related matters this week, those topics seemed to catch my attention for one reason or another.  With the upcoming Iowa caucus on Monday, there is increased attention over what unions are doing (in terms of formally backing candidates, specifically Democrats.)  Given that the caucus is only a few days away, I think it is appropriate to lead things off with an article addressing that matter.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Ahead of Primary Season, Mayor Pete Buttigieg Struggles to Draw Union Endorsements

Matt Pearce at The Los Angeles Times wrote an article late last week in which he noted a stark contrast among several Democratic candidates for the nomination for President.  While South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg has introduced a policy platform that is decidedly labor friendly, so far he has not been able to obtain a union endorsement.  (This is in contrast to other candidates, notably Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who has garnered eleven labor endorsements; former Vice President Joe Biden who has seen five unions come out and endorse him; and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren who has received three endorsements.)  With the Iowa caucus taking place on Monday (and the New Hampshire primary occurring a week later), might Mayor Buttigieg's inability to thus far draw the endorsements of organized labor (a traditionally strong Democratic voting bloc), hinder his chances in these early contests?



Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") released eight new advice memoranda on a wide range of labor related matters, including when an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") by refusing to hire union members; when an employer can deduct union dues without specific, express authorization; and a prohibition on arbitration agreements that prohibit the filing of charges with the NLRB; among other matters.  While these memoranda are non-binding and non-precedential, they provide employers and employees alike with a window into how the NLRB may rule on the labor related matter in the future.  This article from The National Law Review does a good job summarizing each of those eight memoranda.



On Tuesday, a 2 - 1 decision was handed down by the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in which the Court found that because Duquesne University (in beautiful Pittsburgh) was a Roman Catholic institution, there were strict limits on whether a unionization of adjuncts was allowed.  Relying upon a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case, NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, the Court of Appeals held that the National Labor Relations Act did not apply to Duquesne and therefore the adjuncts that sought to unionize (starting back in 2012), were prevented from doing so.  Because Duquesne was held to be a religious institution, the U.S. Supreme Court case did not authorize the NLRB to exercise jurisdiction over teachers (including these adjuncts) in a church operated school, regardless of whether Duquesne was a "completely religious" school or merely "religiously associated."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more