Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


While I did not intend to only read through NLRB and union related matters this week, those topics seemed to catch my attention for one reason or another.  With the upcoming Iowa caucus on Monday, there is increased attention over what unions are doing (in terms of formally backing candidates, specifically Democrats.)  Given that the caucus is only a few days away, I think it is appropriate to lead things off with an article addressing that matter.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Ahead of Primary Season, Mayor Pete Buttigieg Struggles to Draw Union Endorsements

Matt Pearce at The Los Angeles Times wrote an article late last week in which he noted a stark contrast among several Democratic candidates for the nomination for President.  While South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg has introduced a policy platform that is decidedly labor friendly, so far he has not been able to obtain a union endorsement.  (This is in contrast to other candidates, notably Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, who has garnered eleven labor endorsements; former Vice President Joe Biden who has seen five unions come out and endorse him; and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren who has received three endorsements.)  With the Iowa caucus taking place on Monday (and the New Hampshire primary occurring a week later), might Mayor Buttigieg's inability to thus far draw the endorsements of organized labor (a traditionally strong Democratic voting bloc), hinder his chances in these early contests?



Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") released eight new advice memoranda on a wide range of labor related matters, including when an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") by refusing to hire union members; when an employer can deduct union dues without specific, express authorization; and a prohibition on arbitration agreements that prohibit the filing of charges with the NLRB; among other matters.  While these memoranda are non-binding and non-precedential, they provide employers and employees alike with a window into how the NLRB may rule on the labor related matter in the future.  This article from The National Law Review does a good job summarizing each of those eight memoranda.



On Tuesday, a 2 - 1 decision was handed down by the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in which the Court found that because Duquesne University (in beautiful Pittsburgh) was a Roman Catholic institution, there were strict limits on whether a unionization of adjuncts was allowed.  Relying upon a 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case, NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, the Court of Appeals held that the National Labor Relations Act did not apply to Duquesne and therefore the adjuncts that sought to unionize (starting back in 2012), were prevented from doing so.  Because Duquesne was held to be a religious institution, the U.S. Supreme Court case did not authorize the NLRB to exercise jurisdiction over teachers (including these adjuncts) in a church operated school, regardless of whether Duquesne was a "completely religious" school or merely "religiously associated."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more