Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Dallas Cowboys Edition


Another month, and yet another N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuit has been filed in regard to Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") issues.  As readers are well aware, over the past few years, N.F.L. and N.B.A. cheerleaders have filed numerous FLSA and discrimination suits against their teams and the leagues.  For those keeping count, lawsuits have been filed against several teams including the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Jets, Buccaneers, Raiders (again), Bucks, Saints, and Texans.  Although some of those cases have ended up settling, others have continued on without a resolution.  As I have pointed out previously, one of the sticking points with many of these FLSA suits is a provision in the employment agreement that all disputes will be resolved via arbitration...rather than in court.

With that being said, last week, a former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader filed suit against the team and alleged that the Cowboys failed to pay her minimum wage and overtime.  The cheerleader, Erika Wilkins, claims she was paid $8/hour for practices and a flat rate for games and other appearances but was not paid for all the hours she worked (which included practices, training, and filming for the CMT show Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders:  Making the Team).  As a result, Wilkins argues that she is owed unpaid overtime wage, minimum wages, and all other available damages.

This suit is interesting, albeit a bit different than other related cheerleader lawsuits, in so much that Wilkins alleges that the team's mascot, Rowdy, makes $25/hour and about $65,000.00 per year plus commission.  Wilkins argues that Rowdy's job required "equal skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions..."  This is an interesting argument, as Wilkins is attempting to draw a line between what the mascot (played by a male) makes in comparison to the all female cheerleading group in an attempt to establish a violation of the Equal Pay Act.  (For those needing a refresher, the Equal Pay Act, in relevant parts, states that "No employer...shall discriminate...between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees...at a rate less than which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex...for equal work on jobs, the performance of which require equal skill, effort, and responsibility...").

Several former Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders have come out in the past few days in support of the team and somewhat critical of Wilkins.  I link readers to the below article to see some of what is being said in regard to this lawsuit.  For the time being, the team itself has not commented on the lawsuit.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more