Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Coats v. Dish Network, L.L.C., Colorado Supreme Court


As with many employment and labor law related cases that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  A quadriplegic man, Brandon Coats, lost his job at Dish Network after being fired for failing a random drug test as a result of off-the-job medical marijuana use.  Coats claimed he used marijuana to control muscle spasms which resulted from a car accident that left him wheelchair bound.  After being fired, Coats subsequently brought suit against Dish and claimed he had been unlawfully fired as the marijuana use was legal under Colorado state law and that he was never impaired while on the job. 

Looking Back:  The trial court upheld the firing and Coats appealed.  The Colorado Court of Appeals panel affirmed the lower court's ruling and held the firing of Coats was lawful since marijuana is illegal under federal law, employees have no protection to use it anytime they want. 

It is important to note here that Colorado prohibits an employer from firing an employee for lawful off duty conduct, referred to as the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute.  As a result, Coats' argument that even though he tested positive for marijuana, he should be protected from being terminated, could in essence prevail so long as the drug use occurred during non-working hours (which what appears to have happened here).  However, the Court of Appeals noted that nothing illegal under federal law can be considered "lawful" under the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute.  Consequently, any reliance upon the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute proved to be unfounded.

The Main Issue:  Does the Lawful Off Duty Activities Statute protect an employee's right to use marijuana off the clock in a state that lawfully permits marijuana usage and not be subjected to being fired for failing a drug test, even if that drug usage violates federal law? 

Lower Court Opinion:  http://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Court_Of_Appeals/Opinion/2013/12CA0595%20&%2012CA1704-PD.pdf

Current Status:  On January 27, 2014, the Colorado Supreme Court stated that it would review the lower court's opinion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more