Skip to main content

NLRB: Gee Whiz...Union Representative Required for Urine Test


Ralph's Grocery Co. - NLRB


Facts:  Managers at Ralph's Grocery noticed that the conduct of one employee caused them to believe he might be under the influence.  The employee was instructed to submit to a drug and alcohol test which he refused.  The employee was informed that any refusal would result in his termination.  As a result, the employee requested union representation.  After management tried to find a union representative but were unable to do so after about 15 minutes, the employee was directed to take the test or a refusal would constitute a positive test result.  The employee again refused and was subsequently discharged. 

Holding:  An Administrative Law Judge found the discharge interfered with the employee's exercise of his Weingarten rights and a three member panel of the NLRB agreed.  In essence, the Weingarten rule is based upon the notion that employees have a right to union representation in an investigatory proceeding.  In this case, the NLRB held that there was no way to separate the employee's refusal to take the test from the assertion of his Weingarten rights and the employer penalized the employee for refusing to waive those rights.  As a result, Ralph's was required to reinstate the employee.

As others have noted, it appears that the NLRB either views the Weingarten rights as applying to requests to submit to drug and alcohol test (even in the absence of investigatory interview questions), or it views the request for a reasonable suspicion drug and alcohol test to be an "investigatory interview question."  Interesting, if not concerning, either way.  Employers would be wise to find a union member to be a witness for the union employee who requests a union representative after being direct to submit to a drug or alcohol test.

Date:  July 31, 2014

Opinion:  http://www.constangy.net/nr_images/els-ralphs2.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more