Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Game Over, (One) Oakland Raiders Cheerleader Lawsuit Settles


For those keeping track at home, back in January, a lawsuit was filed by a former Oakland Raiders cheerleader who alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") as a result of several wage and hour violations by the Raiders.  (Oakland Raiders Lawsuit Blog).  Since that first lawsuit, several other lawsuits have been brought by current and former N.F.L. cheerleaders against several teams and have alleged similar wage and hour violations.  I have followed these lawsuits with keen interest, but this first one really stood out as it was, in essence, the template for all future cheerleader wage and hour suits.

Well, after several months of litigation, this case has finally settled and the Raiders have agreed to pay $1.25 million.  In addition to that settlement amount, additional provisions were provided for:  

  • Instead of earning $125/game in a single paycheck delivered at the end of the season, the cheerleaders will now earn $9/hour, plus overtime, and will be paid every two weeks.  As a result, the annual compensation will rise from $1,250 to about $3,200 for each cheerleader.  Note, that back in July, the Raiders quietly raised their cheerleaders' pay for the upcoming season to $9/hour.  (Raiders Raise Pay for Cheerleaders Blog).  
  • Cheerleaders will now be reimbursed for business expenses and mileage.  Before the settlement, these costs were covered solely by the cheerleaders
  • The Raiders will no longer illegally deduct wages for minor rules infractions such as showing up a few minutes late, wearing the wrong color nail polish, bringing the wrong pom poms to practice, etc.
  • Cheerleaders will be allowed a 10 minute break during games.

At this point, it is not clear what impact this settlement will have on the other N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuits, let alone the second cheerleader lawsuit filed against the Raiders.  In any event, this is a big win for the cheerleaders who brought the suit and potentially a bit of foreshadowing on how some of the other cases will play out, if they do in fact end up settling as well.


Additional information on the settlement can be found in the LA Times article:  http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-raiders-settle-cheerleader-lawsuit-20140904-column.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more