Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Germany Bans Managers From Calling Employees After Hours

This is an interesting article about a recent move by the German Labor Ministry to ban managers from calling or e-mailing staff outside of work hours, except in cases of emergency.  The Labor Ministry based this reasoning on the grounds that employees need not be under this undue stress from always having to be on call.

In a related note, France has also taken similar measures by banning employers from e-mailing their employees after hours (France Bans After Hours E-mails to Employees).

While this probably would not happen across the board in this country, it is still interesting to note the move by Germany.  Should any employers institute a policy similar to this in the United States, it would more likely be predicated on the grounds of avoiding potential wage and hour issues, rather than minimizing stress on employees. 



This article by Billy Haisley walks through how unions would work in NCAA sports, should that become the norm (for additional reading on NCAA athletes and their attempt to unionize:  Northwestern Football Players Seek to Unionize - Blog; Northwestern Football Players Given Green Light to Unionize - Blog).  While this is not a relatively easy topic to sort through, this article makes it a point of walking through some of the common questions that have arisen since the Northwestern football players were given the authorization to unionize a few weeks ago.



David Zaleski has 9 helpful workplace policies that employers should consider adopting.  While several, such as having zero tolerance for intolerance, are somewhat common sense, Zaleski has thoughts on a more accepting work from home policy that make sense.  While not employers will find these policies to be a good fit with their company, it is good food for thought.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more