Skip to main content

College Football Players: Student Athletes & Now Union Members?


In a somewhat surprising turn of events, for the first time in the history of college sports, college athletes are asking to be represented by a labor union, taking formal steps on Tuesday to begin the process of being recognized as employees.  Ramogi Huma, president of the National College Players Association, filed the petition and union cards signed by an undisclosed number of Northwestern University football players in Chicago today.  In order to represented by a labor union, at least 30 percent of employees (in this case, at least 27 of the 85 scholarship Northwestern University players) need to be in favor of the union to file the document.  Huma did not say specifically how many players signed the cards, only that there was an "overwhelming majority."  The next step is a formal election, which is supervised by the National Labor Relations Board.

Northwestern released a statement and said it supports dialogue around the issues that are important to the union that could potentially represent the football players, and the right of the university's football players to have a voice in that dialogue.  However, Northwestern clarified that it does not support the players organizing through a labor union.

This will be a very interesting issue to keep an eye on.  Over the past few seasons, there has been a growing cry among current and former collegiate sports players for collegiate athletes to be paid. While the Northwestern player's attempts to seek union representation might not be a direct effort to get collegiate athletes paid, it does add fuel to the fire and pushes the issue of whether collegiate athletes are "employees" and therefore entitled to compensation closer to coming to a head. 


Chicago Tribune Article:  http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-northwestern-football-players-labor-union-20140128,0,182603.story 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per