Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: ChatGPT Edition


For those readers that have not followed the news/events that have been unfolding in recent weeks in regard to ChatGPT, let us take a step back.  ChatGPT is an AI chat bot that generates human like text based upon input.  Notably, ChatGPT has passed bar exams, college exams, medical licensing exams, and related testing as well as being able to code, send emails, and producing advertising and press releases.  In doing so, many have attempted to use ChatGPT to simulate work and related projects in the workplace.  Given this sudden rise in popularity (amongst some) with this AI, I think this is a good time to look at how ChatGPT is impacting the workforce in employment related matters.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


ChatGPT & HIPPA Compliance Issues

Ah yes, the situation that likely keeps many in the HR field up at night:  the disclosure of an employee’s medical history/records.  As this article notes, there is concern that while ChatGPT could take over many of the responsibilities of those in HR, at this time there does not appear to be a way to prevent the AI system from disclosing an employee’s medical records.  Many have pointed out that while ChatGPT (and related AI systems) can streamline the process, these AI systems are not full proof.  In this instance, while ChatGPT apparently could be used to ensure compliance with HIPPA, it does not appear the system is capable of handling/processing an employee’s records without disclosing an employee’s medical history.


How ChatGPT Can be Utilized By Those in HR

While many may consider ChatGPT to be an “enemy”, in so much that it could replace employees/jobs, let us consider how it could be utilized by those in the HR field. As Allie Nawrat over at Unleash writes, some in the HR field are finding ways to utilize ChatGPT (and related AI system) to help write job postings, market the employer, and write about positions/careers on the employer’s website.  Now will these AI system replace everything that those in the HR field do?  Not necessarily.  However, there does appear to be room to integrate these systems into the HR field.


Tech Companies Warn Employees Against Sharing Sensitive Data With ChatGPT

In recent days, some big tech companies like Microsoft and Amazon have cautioned their employees against sharing sensitive data with ChatGPT.  It is important to note that these tech companies have generally supported the use and integration of ChatGPT into their work places.  However, there is still some uncertainty as to how/when, and how often ChatGPT should be utilized in the workplace.  As well, there appears to be some apprehension over what ChatGPT could do with sensitive data if it is shared with the AI system by employees.  At this time, while their appears to be no perfect answer/solution to the matter, I expect to see employers begin to implement policies over how/the manner in which these AI systems are used in the workplace. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more