Skip to main content

New Jersey Senate Passes Temporary Worker Bill of Rights


Last Thursday, the New Jersey Senate voted 21 - 16 in favor of passage of S511, the Temporary Worker Bill of Rights.

Advocates of the legislation had long championed it as vital to workers in the state, despite fierce opposition from business groups.  Business groups criticized the legislation over claims it would unnecessarily drive up costs and force companies to move out of the state.

As for the key portions of the legislation itself, S511 provides temporary workers in the state with the right to basic information in English and their native language in regard to where they will be working, their pay rate, their work schedule, the type of work they will be performing, and how much sick leave they would be entitled to receive.

S511 further eliminates many of the fees that temp agencies deduct from workers’ pay, including mandatory fees for things such as vans which shuttle workers to their job sites.

In addition, temporary workers would be guaranteed to earn at least the minimum wage rate after fees are deducted from their paychecks by a temp agency.  Temp agencies would be required to pay these temporary workers the same as a full time worker.

Notably, a vote on S511 had been delayed three times with Democrats in the Senate not having enough support to pass the legislation.  While Governor Phil Murphy had previously vetoed a version of this legislation, it is expected he will sign off on the bill when it reaches his desk.


For a copy of S511:  https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2022/S511

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more