Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


For those that have been living under a rock, following the leak of the United States Supreme Court opinion earlier this year that would have overturned Roe v. Wade (and the subsequent issuance of the opinion on June 24th that did just that), there has been much discussion and debate around the country in regard to what happens next.  Of course, this is a labor & employment law blog so for the purposes of this post, I am only going to highlight how the repeal of Roe v. Wade has started to impact those in the workplace, in particular how some employers are handling the development.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Following Repeal of Roe v. Wade, Some Companies Begin to Offer Assistance to Workers

As reported by Reuters, following last Friday’s decision from the Supreme Court that repealed Roe v. Wade (at the federal level and left it up to the states to handle), some companies have indicated they will begin to cover the cost and expense for their workers that have to travel out of state for an abortion.  While Disney and Meta have announced these policies that will go into place for their employees, I suspect other companies will start to follow suit in the coming weeks and months.


A Closer Look at NLRB’s Top Lawyer, Jennifer Abruzzo

Over the weekend, The Associated Press published an article that took a closer look at Jennifer Abruzzo, the President Biden appointed top prosecutor at the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”).  In the article, it is noted that Abruzzo has indicated that she intends to enact and revive sweeping changes to the labor landscape by bringing about labor friendly initiatives and policies from the NLRB.  With the NLRB soon to inherit a Democratic nominated majority (3 - 2) among Board Members, it is quite likely that Abruzzo can push through with these changes with minimal pushback.  The question then turns to whether the courts could reign in these labor friendly changes down the road.  Stay tuned.


Amazon’s Zoom Meeting to Contest Union Election Goes Off the Rails

Following the successful unionization of an Amazon warehouse in Staten Island, Amazon sought to have the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) not certify those results and instead order a new election take place.  As many NLRB hearings are still being conducted virtually, Amazon’s hearing before the NLRB has been taking place via Zoom.  While this has enabled more people to view the proceedings, it has also resulted in some participants joining, sharing pro union messages or images, shouting out support for the union, and recording the proceedings, among other issues.  While the hearing continues to play out, these outbursts and related sideshows have proven to be an ongoing issue.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more