Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Pardon the brief note this week, but I found myself tied up with a few projects that left me with little time to page through articles.  With that being said there are two updates n a minimum wage and labor law related topic that are worth highlighting.  I encourage readers to take a few minutes and page through these two updates.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Hawaii: The First State With an $18/Hour Minimum Wage Rate?

As The Maui News reported earlier this week, the Hawaii Legislature approved legislation that will raise the state’s minimum wage rate to $18/hour by 2028.  The bill now goes to the desk of Governor David Ige who has previously indicated he supports a $18/hour wage rate.  Within 6 years time, Hawaii should have the highest minimum wage rate.  However, with some states having a plan in place to increase wage rates with inflation, it is possible that by 2028, other states will have an $18/hour (or higher wage rate.)


Starbucks to Hike Wages & Offer Additional Training For (Some) Workers

As Amelia Lucas at CNBC reports, Starbucks has announced that it will hike wages and offer increased training for its workers.  However, a caveat exists:  Those stores that have voted to unionize will not see these changes.  For those wondering why these unionized stores will not realize the same benefit as those stores which have not unionized, it is quite simple.  Those stores that have unionized have a union that must negotiate any changes in the condition of employment (such as wage hikes).  Starbucks cannot unilaterally impose these changes without bargaining with the union.  For the time being, this is one way that Starbucks is attempting to fight back against the growing unionization sweeping its company.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more