Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

At the end of every year, I traditionally do an overview of some of the key highlights (or perhaps lowlights) on the labor & employment law front around the country over the prior 12 months.  With the coronavirus dominating news coverage since at least early March (and the subsequent impact on workplace issues), I could spend hours going through labor & employment law developments that have arisen because of the virus.  However, rather than rehashing that matter, I think it is more appropriate to turn the page on 2020 and move forward into the new year.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


COVID, the Vaccine, & Age Discrimination

I intended to focus on a few non-coronavirus related topics this week, but this article is especially timely and worth highlighting at the outset.  The National Law Review recently wrote an insightful article on potential age discrimination issues that may arise for employers as the vaccine rolls out across the country.  While this article may not be applicable to all employers, it is worth a quick read to understand the basics of what type of age discrimination issues might arise going forward.


Boston Mayor Marty Walsh Emerges As Strong Favorite for Biden’s Labor Secretary

Boston.com reported recently that Democratic Boston Mayor Marty Walsh has emerged as a strong favorite to become President Elect Joe Biden’s Labor Secretary.  Walsh, who has strong union ties (including as a member of Laborers’ Union Local 223) is a “trendy” pick among those seeking the Labor Secretary position.  However, there is some concern that nominating Walsh will not provide Biden with the diversity to his cabinet that many have called for since November’s election.  Whether Walsh can continue to galvanize enough support to secure the nomination remains to be seen.  However, Labor Secretary is one of the preeminent positions in Biden’s cabinet that has not seen a nominee put forth yet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more