Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Rounding out a shorter week, I found a couple articles worth highlighting.  In particular, I call attention to a development at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which has the potential to dramatically impact how the agency (and its general counsel) litigate matters going forward.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Restaurant Owners, Rising Labor Costs, & Staying Afloat

Jaya Saxena at Eater wrote an article recently that took stock among some restaurant owners in regard to how they were managing to pay their employees a living wage while also juggling increasing menu prices (to the chagrin of some customers.)  It should come as no surprise that with many employers increasing pay rates for their employees (whether voluntarily or by local ordinance/statute), that has resulted in increasing prices on the menu to offset the rising labor costs.  I will refer readers to the article for a survey of how some of these employers have implemented the rising labor costs and the positive/negative results it has produced.  For many of these employers, however, increasing prices on menus is worth doing in order to stay afloat.


EEOC Considering Requiring Commission Vote Before General Counsel Could File Suit

In a somewhat novel situation, the Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), Janet Dhillon, recently circulated a proposal which would require the approval of the five EEOC Commissioners before the EEOC’s General Counsel could file a lawsuit.  (Currently, the General Counsel is charged with filing lawsuits without needing the approval of the EEOC Commissioners.)  Of course, any cynic would look at this proposal and claim it was an attempt to hinder the incoming administration of Joe Biden from implementing and litigating its own EEOC agenda.  However, with Republican appointed EEOC Commissioners having a 3 - 2 majority control of the EEOC until 2022, this proposal is an attempt to stymie the incoming administration before it even takes office next month.  Will it work?  That is tough to say as similar proposals have been circulated over the years, including last year, without much success.  If this proposal gets approved, it will be a hard fought scrap to get there.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more