Skip to main content

Updated: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Clears House of Representatives

 

Recently, with the U.S House of Representatives voting 329 - 73 in favor of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, the legislation moves to the Senate for further debate and (unlikely) vote.

Readers will recall that last month I had highlighted this legislation as one to keep an eye on.  The legislation, sponsored by Democrats (who have majority control of the House), would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations to help pregnant workers continue working as well as prohibit employers from denying employment opportunities to these workers because they are pregnant.

As I had noted in my prior post, even with this legislation clearing the House (by a sizable margin), I think it is unlikely it will get very far in the Senate for a few reasons.  For starters, the Senate is in effect operating on a limited capacity for a few weeks because of several Senators testing positive for the coronavirus.  As well, once the Senate gets back to business as usual, I suspect the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett for the United States Supreme Court will occupy much of the Senate’s time.  With Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likely making other legislation a priority while Republicans have majority control of the Senate (possibly only for a limited time, depending the outcome of several Senate races on November 3rd), the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act will likely languish in a Senate Committee for the time being.  The one hope for advocates of the legislation?  Either Democrats gain majority control of the Senate in November or enough Republican Senators voice their support for passage of the legislation that the Senate Majority Leader acquiesces and allows a floor vote.  

Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2694/text

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more