Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A development the past few weeks in regard to a potential union forming at a newspaper in Dallas is worth an in depth read.  In a right to work state like Texas (which is not overly unionized), this potential formation of a union at The Dallas Morning News is worth watching closely.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Union Brewing at Dallas’ Largest Newspaper 

A few weeks ago, it was announced that a union was forming at Dallas’ largest newspaper, The Dallas Morning News.   This potential union, a combination of 100 employees from The Dallas Morning News and Al Día Dallas, have several grievances including a claim that their employer failed to provide them personal protective equipment quickly enough which resulted in employees being exposed to tear gas while covering stories the past few months.  According to these employees, workers at other news outlets were provided this equipment.  While The Dallas Morning Mews has previously fought back against a union forming before, it will be interesting to see what comes of this particular effort.


Following the Longest Lag in a Minimum Wage Hike, Is Now the Time?

Aimee Picchi at CBS News wrote an article earlier this week noting that since the last minimum wage hike eleven years ago, perhaps now is the time for an increase.  Of note, this is the longest “break” in hikes to the federal minimum wage rate, since the minimum wage rate was bumped up to $7.25/hour back in July of 2009.  With a report out earlier this week that Austin, Texas is the least affordable city to live in (on a minimum wage salary), Picchi suggests that notwithstanding the coronavirus pandemic, perhaps now is the time to increase the federal minimum wage rate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...