Skip to main content

Labor Department: Exempt Employees Do Not Lose Status Under FLSA if Performing Non Exempt Duties During the Pandemic


Last week, the Labor Department issued guidance on the question of whether exempt workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) lose their exempt status if they also perform non exempt tasks during the coronavirus pandemic.

Taking a step back, the FLSA provides that workers can be either exempt or non exempt, depending upon their work responsibilities.  Generally speaking, if the worker is exempt, they are not entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA.  If the worker is non exempt, they could potentially qualify for overtime pay if they worked more than 40 hours in a workweek.  The issue that has arisen as of late is how employers are to proceed during the coronavirus pandemic, given that some workplaces have cut their labor force in an effort to make ends meet.  In doing so, that often entails the workers that remain to pick up the slack and assume additional responsibilities.  In some workplaces, that may involve an exempt worker (for instance, one that is primarily engaged in administrative tasks) to now do basic filing, answering of phones, sorting through mail, etc.  Those additional tasks might be deemed non exempt.  As a result, there is often concern over whether that exempt employee would now be classified as non exempt under the FLSA.

Last week’s guidance from the Labor Department sought to remedy the concern by stipulating that salaried executives, administrative, and professional employees that are exempt under the FLSA remain exempt, even if they are now performing some non exempt duties during the coronavirus pandemic.  Employers can breathe a sigh of relief if they were dangerously toeing the line, although the Labor of Department has clarified that this guidance is only really in place during the coronavirus pandemic.  Once that starts to subside, I would expect this guidance to change.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more