Skip to main content

EEOC: Proper Use of IRS Form 8850 For WOTC Does Not Run Afoul of Anti-Discrimination Laws


At the end of April, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued an opinion letter which confirmed its belief that the proper use of Internal Revenue Service Form 8850 (“Form 8850”) for the Federal Work Opportunity Tax Credit (“WOTC”) does not run afoul of anti-discrimination laws.

For those not familiar with the WOTC, it provides employers with a tax credit by encouraging them to “hire and train people who are experiencing severe difficulties that are often linked to unemployment.”  Those employment candidates that enable an employer to qualify for the WOTC include recipients of some state and federal aid programs (such as food stamps), those that have finished or are still working through some rehabilitation services, and some individuals convicted of felonies.  Form 8850 requires that these individuals self identify and provide information to confirm the employer is entitled to the tax credit.

Naturally, there has been some concern and hesitation among employers over whether this requested information puts them in violation of anti-discrimination laws.  However, the EEOC’s April 29th opinion letter should provide some reassurance.  In the opinion letter itself, the EEOC states that the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) are not violated as the questions themselves on Form 8850 do not require applicants to actually disclose if they have a disability (which could be prohibited under the ADA), provide age related information (which could be prohibited under the ADEA), or whether they are a member of a protected group (which could be prohibited under Title VII.)

As always, there are caveats to remember here.  The EEOC is not giving employers the green light to ask for any information or documentation they want in order to qualify for the WOTC.  Rather, so long as employers strictly comply with Form 8850, taking part in the WOTC in and of itself does not mean an employer has violated an anti-discrimination law.


For a copy of the opinion letter:  https://www.eeoc.gov/commission-opinion-letter-federal-work-opportunity-tax-credit-form-8850

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more