Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


To the surprise of very few, coronavirus related matters have dominated not only the news cycle the past few weeks but also employment and labor law related news.  While I hope to highlight a broader scope of articles next week, this week is pretty straight and to the point.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Labor Department Publishes Guidance on Families First Coronavirus Response Act

Many readers are likely wondering how (or if) the Families First Coronavirus Response Act will impact their ability to take paid leave while this pandemic plays out, given that Congress recently passed the legislation and President Donald Trump signed it into law.  Well look no further, the Labor Department released guidance for employers, employees, and a FAQ section on Monday.  For those looking for a break from their work from home routine, this resource is well worth a quick read.


Labor Unions Go to Bat to Get $58 Billion For Airline Industry

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate approved an aide package, in response to the impact the coronavirus pandemic has had on the economy.  That aide package includes approximately $58 billion earmarked for the aviation industry.  Unsurprisingly, prior to yesterday’s vote, that $58 billion earmark quickly came under fire.  However, Leslie Josephs over at CNBC has a good article which notes that labor unions pushed lawmakers for approval of that $58 billion dollar earmark.  Part of the selling point from the unions?  The money would go toward payroll (to help keep pilots, air crew, grounds crew, etc) employed...rather than the money going toward corporate bonuses or stock buybacks.  With the House of Representatives voting on the legislation today, will this $58 billion earmark stay in?  With a Democratic controlled (and labor friendly House), the unions might not have to do much convincing.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more