Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Senate Bill 3396 (Illinois)


As with many labor and employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


In recent weeks, Illinois Republican State Senator Chuck Weaver introduced a bill, Senate Bill 3396, which would divide the state into six zones and allow the minimum wage rate to fluctuate below the statewide $15/hour minimum wage rate, set to take effect by 2025.  (Does this remind anyone of former Governor Bruce Rauner’s right to work zones?  Granted Senate Bill 3396 concerns minimum wage rate zones while Governor Rauner’s proposal involved right to work zones...somewhat similar.)

Senate Bill 3396 would allow municipalities or counties, by a vote of the local governing body, to opt out of the statewide minimum wage rate and opt in to a regionally adjusted minimum wage rate that would be statutorily authorized and statutorily regulated.  Notably, there would be a sliding scale in place so that regions of the state with historically low unemployment or higher cost of living would be required to stay closer to the statewide minimum wage rate.  (Note, however that Cook County and Chicago would be barred from opting out of the statewide minimum wage rate.)  Senate Bill 3396 has been couched as a solution to the problem many small businesses in the state are grappling with:  how to afford the rising labor costs without drastically cutting their workforce or closing altogether.  For instance, if a certain county voted to opt out and had a cost of living 30% less than the rest of the state, those workers could receive 30% less than the statewide minimum wage rate.

Democratic Governor J.B. Pritzker has been critical of the legislation, stating that if one worker in the state was “worth” the $15/hour wage rate, then every worker in the state should be “worth” the $15/hour wage rate.  Other Democrats have argued that while the legislation might provide a solution, it would be more appropriate to instead offer incentives to help support businesses in parts of the state that will struggle to pay their workers in accordance with the new wage rate.  While this legislation was only just introduced, there will likely be a great deal of consideration and debate on the matter both in committee and in the General Assembly.  However, with Democrats having majority control of the General Assembly (and a Democratic Governor), unless they want to work with Republicans, this legislation might not have the legs to get very far.


For additional information:  https://www.wgil.com/2020/02/25/weavers-bill-lets-local-governments-set-minimum-wage-based-on-region/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more