Skip to main content

New Laws for 2020: Pittsburgh Paid Sick Leave


Beginning March 15th, employers in Pittsburgh will be required to provide their employees with paid sick leave, at a rate of one hour of paid sick leave for every thirty five hours worked (within the geographic scope of the city.)

I suppose this is as good of a time as any to look at the specifics:
  • The employer can "front load" the available paid sick leave at the beginning of the work year or else allow the employee to carry it over up to the applicable accrual cap per employee.
  • Notably, unused paid sick leave does not need to be paid out to the employee if they leave their employment, unless the employee is reinstated within six months.
  • The accrued paid sick leave may be used for a mental or physical illness or injury of the employee or family member and the closure of the employer's place of business (or the employee's child's school) due to a public health emergency.  
  • Employees are to be paid their regular rate for the sick time.  
  • While new employees are not entitled to use the paid sick leave, they are able to do so after 90 days of employment.
  • Employees are not required to find a replacement for their missed time.
  • Perhaps just as important, an employer cannot retaliate against an employee for using their paid sick leave.
  • However, an employer may require the employee to provide verification if the sick leave absence lasts three days or longer.

Now there is an important carve out here for smaller employers in the city:  the requirement to provide paid sick leave for employers with fewer than fifteen employees does not go into effect until March 15, 2021.  While these smaller employers have some breathing room to implement the paid sick leave into their policies...for all other employers in Pittsburgh, March 15th is right around the corner.


For additional information:  https://apps.pittsburghpa.gov/redtail/images/8015_Guidelines_for_Paid_Sick_Days_Act.docx__FINAL_12-16-19.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations