Skip to main content

New Hampshire Governor Vetoes Paid Family Leave Bill


Last Thursday, New Hampshire Republican Governor Chris Sununu vetoed a paid family leave bill that was approved by the New Hampshire Legislature.

The legislation, Senate Bill 1, would have required employers in the state to provide paid family leave insurance to all employees, whether through employers' own efforts or a statewide program that would require 0.5% of weekly wages to be paid to the Department of Employment Security.  That 0.5% deduction could have been covered by employers or been deducted from employees' wages.  As for the specifics of the paid leave itself, employees could have received up to 12 weeks of paid time off at 60% of wages.  The paid leave could have been used for births, adoptions, non-employment related health emergencies, or family illness.  If employers chose to offer an alternative paid family leave plan, they had the ability to do so, so long as it would have provided employees the equivalent of what Senate Bill 1 offered.

Now readers are likely asking themselves:  Ok, what now?  Well, there are a few possibilities here.  1) Democrats, which have majority control in the New Hampshire Legislature could seek to override Governor Sununu's veto.  However, many observers question whether Democrats have the votes to do so.  At this point, short of some Republicans jumping across the aisle, it looks like a veto would not be possible.  2) There is a competing paid leave proposal that Governor Sununu and Vermont Governor Phil Scott have proposed.  That proposal, the Twin State Voluntary Leave Plan, would provide voluntary paid family and medical leave to employees in New Hampshire and Vermont.  The funding of it is a bit more complex than Senate Bill 1, although the key takeaway is the Twin State Voluntary Leave Plan would not impose a "tax"...which was how Governor Sununu labeled the funding source for Senate Bill 1.

As Governor Sununu has torpedoed the paid leave plan proposed by Democrats in the state, it would not surprise me if Democrats turned around and torpedoed the Governor's plan.  And for workers in New Hampshire, they continue to sit idly by, waiting for paid leave to become a reality in the state.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more