Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


Following former National Labor Relations Board Member Mark Gaston Pearce withdrawing last week from being reappointed to his old position, I wanted to highlight that pivotal development for readers.  With that being said, there have been quite a few other labor law related developments that are worth highlighting this week, such that I want to dedicate this post to that very topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Craft Breweries & Unions: The Next Frontier?

Saddle up to the bar for a minute, partner.  Alex Press at In These Times wrote an article last Friday that recognized a recent rally by workers at Anchor Brewing Company that are seeking to unionize.  Following a rally in the Mission District in San Francisco, the crowd split up to canvas the neighboring area to bring awareness to their unionization effort.  This rally came on the heels of Anchor Brewing Company receiving notice of the unionization effort by employees.  Notably, these workers are seeking to be among the first unionized craft breweries in the country.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Former National Labor Relations Board Member Pearce Withdraws His Renomination

Last Wednesday, former National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") Member Mark Gaston Pearce announced he would not seek renomination to the NLRB, following the end of his term ended last August.  NLRB Member Pearce, nominated by President Barack Obama, had played an instrumental role in many employee and labor friendly decisions from the NRLB, including the infamous Browning-Ferris joint employer decision.  When his term expired, he was renominated.  (Traditionally, the NLRB is comprised of three members from the sitting President's party with the other two members coming from the other party).  However, after his renomination sat idle in the Senate, NLRB Member Pearce stated that he was withdrawing his renomination to "remove myself from the center of a political tug of war that has spanned five months."  At this point, Republicans in the Senate have shown little inclination to move quickly on any new nominee to the NLRB.  For the time being, the NLRB has four Members, with a 3 - 1 employer friendly majority.


The NLRB & Documenting Employee Misconduct

Michael Ryan over at Labor & Employment Law Perspectives uses a recent case out of Alabama that involved the NLRB to help illustrate the point that employers would be wise to diligently document employee misconduct or be faced with an uphill battle if that employee contests a ‘negative’ employment action such as a suspension, termination, etc.  as always, every situation is different, but Michael provides some good pointers here.


BuzzFeed News Employees Intend to Form a Union

Following BuzzFeed's layoffs last month of nearly 15% of its workforce, employee's at the company's news division announced on Tuesday that they planned to form a union.  In the announcement, the organizing committee stated they had been organizing for several months and sought to unionize to bring attention to alleged unfair pay disparities, mismanaged pivots and layoffs, weak benefits, skyrocketing health insurance costs, diversity, and other related grievances.  As Jaclyn Peiser at The New York Times writes, there have been rumblings of unionization at BuzzFeed going back to 2015.  Whether this recent unionization talk amounts to anything remains to be seen.



As many readers have likely heard, Amazon announced two locations for its new HQ2 location, with one being located in Long Island City in New York.  After the announcement was made, many in the Long Island City community began to rail against the company believing that Amazon moving into their neighborhood would harm the community and its character.  Recently, labor unions have joined the fray, with the Teamsters Joint Council 16 and Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union voicing their concern with the Long Island City HQ2 location as well as with Amazon itself.  Monica Nickelsburg at GeekWire writes that the unions have expressed disapproval over the way they believe Amazon treats its workers and argue that the company has a history of anti-union behavior.  I question whether this "protest" of the Long Island City HQ2 results in Amazon pulling out of its planned location in New York.  In the interim, however, the unions' growing frustration with Amazon is starting to garner (unwanted) attention for the company.

(Special note:  I found the above article earlier this week and thought it worth highlighting.  Well, yesterday afternoon The New York Times reported that Amazon was withdrawing its plans to build the HQ2 location in Long Island City, reportedly due in part to the union backlash the company had received.  Although the GeekWire article is not necessarily timely at this point...it goes to show the effect that can come about when a union and its supporters get vocal.)


NLRB to Consider if National Labor Relations Act Covers Charter Schools

Last month, the NLRB granted a request for review by the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO.  In doing so, the NLRB will decide whether prior precedent, which held that the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") covers charter schools, should be modified or overruled.  If the NLRB declines to exercise jurisdiction over charter schools (as many expect will happen), these unionized employees would fall outside the protection of the NLRA.  Notably NLRB Member Lauren McFerran (the "lone" employee/union friendly NLRB Member) wrote a sharp dissent in which she argued that a change in the composition of the NLRB was not grounds for overturning precedent.  Nevertheless, I think a 3-1 decision will likely be issued that finds the NLRB does not have jurisdiction over charter schools...thus taking these employees outside the scope of the NLRA.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...