Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Right to Work Edition


The U.S. Supreme Court made its long awaited ruling in Janus v. AFSCME earlier this week.  That development needs no introduction as readers have surely heard about the Court's decision and seen the immediate implications of what that ruling could mean for labor unions.  Rather than rehash that decision just a few days later, I thought it would be appropriate to instead look at a few other right to work matters pending across the country.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Could Supporters of a Right to Work Bill In New Hampshire Use Janus As a Springboard?

Todd Bookman wrote a brief note that highlighted a somewhat renewed sense of optimism among Republicans in New Hampshire that have thus far failed to get a right to work bill passed in the state.  Although several attempts have been made in the past few years (despite appearing to have the votes to pass a bill), New Hampshire has yet to join the growing ranks of right to work states.  Could the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Janus be the shot in the arm to finally get a statewide law passed?  Perhaps.  But as Bookman notes, advocates of right to work in New Hampshire are feeling a lot more optimistic this week.


Ahead of August Vote on Right to Work in Missouri, Increase in Money To Support/Contest Measure Continues

Readers are likely well aware that the ongoing fight to turn Missouri into a right to work state has been a long and winding road.  Now that voters in the state will have an opportunity to vote on the right to work measure in August, supporters and opponents of right to work have begun to dig in and increase their spending in an effort to sway voters.  As Allison Kite at The Kansas City Star writes, nearly $14 million has been raised so far (which apparently tops a fundraising campaign a few years ago to increase cigarette tax) with still about another month to go before voters head to the poll.  Besides the ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week, this is one of the other hot button employment and labor law issues to keep an eye on this summer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more