Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Late last year, I made note of a paid leave bill working its way through the New Hampshire Legislature.  At the time, the proposal appeared to have bipartisan support and there was speculation that after a few prior false starts on similar legislation, this version of paid leave might have enough support to become law.  Unfortunately for proponents of this bill, the measure failed yesterday after Republicans defeated the measure.  Although the fight for paid leave in the state might be on the back burner for now, I would expect supporters of paid leave to give it another go down the road.  The only question is how long they will wait to push another paid leave bill.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Bike Rider Terminated For Flipping Off President Trump's Motorcade Sues Former Employer

Back in November, I pointed readers to an employee of a government contractor that was terminated after a picture of her flipping off President Donald Trump's motorcade went viral.  (The employee did not hide her 'pride' of the image as she used the picture for her social media avatar).  Earlier this month however, she filed suit against her employer and claimed she had been unlawfully terminated (by apparently being forced to resign).  The suit also claims she was promised four weeks of severance pay but only received two.  I have not seen any formal response from her former employer but I am interested to see how this one plays out.  I suspect the issue over severance pay will be more of a black and white issue compared to the disputes over whether her termination was in violation of her First Amendment rights.  Stay tuned.


Paid Family & Medical Leave Falters in New Hampshire Senate

As Adam Sexton at WMUR notes, a paid family & medical leave bill failed to advance yesterday in the New Hampshire Senate after Republicans rejected the bill.  The proposal would have provided an opt out insurance program that would have allowed workers in the state to obtain up to 6 weeks of paid leave (at 60% of their salary), paid for via a .67% insurance premium on wages.  What ultimately did this piece of legislation in?  Perhaps one of two things:  1) Opponents of the bill successfully managed to characterize the proposal as an income tax; and 2) State officials that would have administered the paid leave plan could not confirm that the program would actually be solvent.  For the time being, workers in the state are denied a paid family & medical leave plan, although something tells me supporters of this plan will regroup, retool their message, and try again.


Flagstaff's Office of Labor Standards Identifies 3 Employers Violated New Minimum Wage Law

Flagstaff recently raised minimum wage rates in the city to $10.50/hour, higher than the statewide hourly minimum wage rate of $10/hour.  Flagstaff's Office of Labor Standards, charged with enforcing the new minimum wage rates, reports that over the past six months, 17 complaints have been filed claiming employers in the city are not complying with the new wage rates.  Of those 17 complaints, Flagstaff's Office of Labor Standards identified 3 employers that failed to pay their employees in accordance with these new wage rates and have been required to pay back pay and damages.   Although none of these employers have been identified publicly, at least 2 are apparently hotels.  I suspect that there will likely be more employers that will be found to have violated the new wage rates in the coming months, but if 'only' 3 employers in Flagstaff have been found to be in violation so far, those are relatively low numbers which should be viewed as an overall positive.


Two Former NFL Cheerleaders Offer to Resolve Their Discrimination Claims For $1

A few weeks ago, I pointed readers to a discrimination claim filed by a former Saints cheerleader after she was terminated from the cheerleading group when it became known she posted a picture on Instagram in a one piece swimsuit (in violation of a cheerleading policy the team had in place).  A former Miami Dolphins cheerleader also filed a related discrimination suit against the league recently as well.  This week, the attorney that represents both cheerleaders sent the N.F.L. a letter and offered to settle the discrimination claims for $1 and a four hour meeting with N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell to discuss alleged widespread harassment of cheerleaders in the league, low pay, and long hours, among other related concerns.  At this point, the N.F.L. has not formally accepted or declined the offer.  I question whether the offer would actually be accepted, but in the interim, it certainly keeps both harassment claims in the news and at the forefront of current workplace harassment discussions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...