Skip to main content

Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District Special Election Could Foreshadow Strength of Union Vote


For those that are not aware, there is a special election today in Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District between Democrat Conor Lamb and Republican Rick Saccone.  Traditionally, an off year Congressional election might not merit much attention, but given the fact that both Democrats and Republicans have spent significant time and money on the election and the fact that unions and labor law issues have become a focal point gives me reason to take note.

Readers are likely aware that unions have seen a shrinking presence in the workplace and diminished political influence over the past few decades.  As a result, unions, a traditional supporter of Democrats, have had less impact on recent elections than in the past.  In the 2016 Presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton struggled to draw (or even maintain) the traditional Democratic voting block of union voters.  In fact, it was actually President Donald Trump that was able to capture a larger share of union voters than many anticipated (for a Republican candidate, that is).

However, Democrats and pro-union groups hope that today's special election will signal a turning point for unions.  The Democratic candidate, Lamb, has made it a major point of emphasis to embrace unions and campaign alongside them, going so far as to tell union steelworkers "You've been the heart and soul of this campaign." at a recent rally.  As well, Democrats have pointed out that Saccone supports right to work legislation (as readers will recall, this is kryptonite to many unions and their supporters) in an effort to solidify union support behind Lamb.

Not to be outdone, President Trump campaigned for Saccone this past weekend and attempted to use his 2016 victory to help push the Republican candidate to victory.  (President Trump won the district by nearly 20 points in 2016).  As well, many "rank and file" steelworkers in the district have switched party affiliations in recent years to Republican and have expressed concern over whether Democrats (and Lamb) will actually represent their best interests.

While the race remains tight (and many observers think Lamb will secure a narrow victory), many view today's 18th Congressional special election as a litmus test for both Democrats and Republicans to gauge where they stand among unions and pro-labor groups heading into this year's mid-term election.  Win, lose, or draw, I suspect both parties will likely use the outcome of this election to fine tune their national message on labor law related issues ahead of this year's election (and the upcoming 2020 Presidential election).


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per