Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: The Workplace Democracy Enhancement Act (New Jersey)


As with many employment and labor law related bills (and cases) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.

This is one to keep an eye on.


Yesterday, Democrats in New Jersey advanced a bill, NJ A3686 (18R) (also known as The Workplace Democracy Enhancement Act), out of the the Assembly Labor Committee by a 6 - 3 vote along party lines.  The bill, among other things, would require public employers to provide unions with greater access to the employees they represent.  The bill provides that unions would be allowed to meet with employees on the work premises (such as during lunch and other breaks) to discuss workplace issues, collective negotiations, and investigate and discuss grievances.  

As well, unions would be able to meet with newly hired employees (without a charge to the pay or leave time of these employees) for a minimum of 30 minutes, within 30 days from the date of hire, during new employee orientations (or if the employer does not have new employee orientations, at individual or group meetings).

Proponents of the bill have argued it would strengthen communication between unions and their members and the bill's sponsor, Craig Coughlin (a Democrat from Middlesex, New Jersey), noted it would ultimately create "a more trusting and productive work environment."  On the other hand, opponents have argued that this bill would result in taxpayer funded time out of the workday for employees.  Some have gone so far as to argue that this bill would place an undue burden on employers in the state to accommodate unions and their members and ultimately could lead to a disruptive process in the workplace.

This bill still has a ways to go before becoming law.  However, if Democrats in the state can rally around the bill and continue moving it along, The Workplace Democracy Enhancement Act could become a reality sooner rather than later.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more