Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It has been quite some time since I have covered a ban the box measure/bill/law/ordinance.  With that being said, I want to point readers to a development out of Kansas City yesterday on the topic.  While Missouri has banned the box for state hiring a few years ago (and the Kansas City government previously implemented the policy for many city employees), this is still a big step for ban the box advocates.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Paid Leave Appears to Be Full Steam Ahead in Maryland

Recently, I had pointed readers to an update in Maryland in which, after the General Assembly overrode a veto by Governor Larry Hogan, the state was on track to implement paid leave this month.  However, there was some concern that such a quick implementation of the law gave employers in the state little time to prepare and plan accordingly to ensure compliance.  As Scott Dance at The Baltimore Sun writes, an attempt was made to delay implementation of the law for two months (to allow employers to prepare), but that appears to have gone nowhere.  Therefore, employers in the state are now on the clock with February 11 being the date this law is set to take effect.  This is good news for paid leave advocates that have fought a long battle to implement paid leave in Maryland...but a burden on employers who now will have to act quickly to ensure compliance.


Kansas City Council Approves Ban the Box Measure

Yesterday, the Kansas City Council approved a ban the box measure which will bar employers from asking applicants about their criminal records until later in the application process.  Now keep in mind that employers are not required to hire applicants with a criminal record.  Instead, as with many ban the box measures, this prohibition on asking about criminal records is meant to put all applicants on a level playing field without "coloring" the minds of employers during the initial application process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...