Skip to main content

President Trump's Proposed Budget Calls For 6 Weeks of Paid Leave


On Monday, President Donald Trump's administration rolled out its 2019 budget request and addendum which includes a proposal for 6 weeks of paid leave for new mothers and fathers (including those who adopt).  As always, many will now ask, "Ok, how are you going to pay for it?"  Under the 2019 budget request, these 6 weeks of paid leave would be funded through state unemployment insurance.  (Readers might recall that this is nearly identical to last year's proposal in the 2018 budget request).  

This proposal has started to gain traction among ranking Republicans in Congress, including Mike Lee (from Utah) and Jodi Ernst (from Iowa).  However, there have been critics (on both sides of the aisle) that have argued that funding paid leave through state unemployment insurance is an idea destined to fail...given that it could further hamper already cash-strapped state unemployment insurance.  That could lead to states choosing to raise taxes to cover this paid leave proposal.

Interesting to note that this paid leave proposal in President Trump's budget request bypasses a paid leave idea that had been floated by Senator Marco Rubio and Ivanka Trump earlier this month.  As readers are likely aware, that proposal has met much heavier resistance (notwithstanding the fact that Senator Rubio and Ivanka Trump have yet to produce an actual bill).

Will President Trump's proposal gain much traction?  It is certainly possible as there appears to be an appetite among both Republicans and Democrats to finally approve some sort of nationwide paid leave plan.  The question is whether enough Congressmen and Congresswomen can rally around one proposal to actually make nationwide paid leave a reality.

Stay tuned.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more