Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I always enjoy reading through different perspectives on the minimum wage hikes (and impacts they will have).  This week was no exception as an article from The Washington Post did a good job summarizing some reports and findings on the impact minimum wage hikes are already having around the country.  If you are going to check out one article on minimum wage hikes this week, I would start with that one.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


The Gig Economy: The Next Frontier For Union Organization?

Samuel Estreicher at Bloomberg wrote a thought provoking article on Tuesday which suggested that Uber drivers (or really anyone in the gig economy) should be able to organize and form a union that can collectively bargain on their behalf.  Samuel gets into some of the finer details in regard to the independent contractor v. employee debate that revolves around those involved in the gig economy and ultimately comes to the conclusion that these workers should have the right to organize and collectively bargain without risk of antitrust liability.  While this is a shorter article, it is well worth a read.


A Murky Picture Begins to Emerge In Regard to the Impact From Minimum Wage Hikes

As readers are aware, minimum wage hikes are becoming more commonplace in cities, counties, and states across the country.  With those minimum wage hikes, many have started to wonder what impact (positive or negative) will ultimately result for employers and employees alike.  Christopher Ingraham at The Washington Post published an article recently that summarized some findings and reports on the matter and paint a somewhat murky picture.  While some reports suggest that minimum wage hikes in some areas (such as Seattle) will have a detrimental impact, other reports suggest minimum wage hikes (for instance, in California) will actually have an overall positive effect.  However, as these reports point out, the research is still early and incomplete.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...