Skip to main content

Department of Labor Appeals Overtime Rule Injunction


A few weeks ago, I updated readers on the status of the overtime rule that had previously been announced during President Barack Obama's time in office.  That proposed rule sought to raise the overtime threshold and would have required employers to pay overtime to employees that earned less than $47,476.00 per year (up from the current "cut off" of $23,660.00 per year.)

Before the new overtime rule went into effect, late last year, a Federal judge in Texas issued a preliminary injunction that blocked the implementation of the rule.  When President Donald Trump came into office, it was widely expected his Department of Labor would not appeal the preliminary injunction.  Subsequent to President Trump taking office, the judge who issued the preliminary injunction granted summary judgment in the case which made the injunction permanent.

To the surprise of some, this week, the Department of Labor appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The Department of Labor couched its appeal with a recognition that it was done, in part, to maintain the ability of the Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta, to establish overtime regulations if he so chose.  In essence, the filing of the appeal allows the Department of Labor to preserve its options and challenge the apparent limits placed on the Department of Labor's rulemaking authority (which the Federal judge seemed to do in his order granting summary judgment.)  

Now to clarify, this is for all intents and purposes likely not an an attempt by the Department of Labor of ultimately seeking to enforce the overtime rule proposed during President Obama's term.  As noted above, this appeal seeks to clarify the scope of the Department of Labor's rulemaking authority.  Secretary Acosta and the Trump administration have previously indicated their interest in raising the overtime threshold from its current $23,660.00 per year threshold.  Something tells me we may see some movement on that front in the coming months.


For additional information:  https://www.benefitnews.com/news/dol-appeals-ruling-on-overtime-rule

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more