Skip to main content

Illinois Governor Is On the Ropes In His Fight to Allow Right to Work Zones


I have previously referenced Republican Governor Bruce Rauner's attempts to allow local governments in Illinois to establish right to work zones.  A somewhat controversial proposal, given the Democratic make up and pro-labor history in the state, Governor Rauner has pushed for this to become a reality in the state.  This past September, Democrats sent Governor Rauner a bill that would prevent local governments from setting up right to work zones and instead give only the General Assembly the ability to create right to work policies.  Unsurprisingly, Governor Rauner vetoed that bill.  As has been mentioned before, this right to work zone dispute arose after the Lake County village of Lincolnshire approved a right to work ordinance in 2015 (that was subsequently struck down in federal court.)  Currently, that case is being appealed with Governor Rauner backing an appeal all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

Last Wednesday, Democrats sought to override the Governor's veto.  While the Senate had the votes to override the veto, the House fell one vote short.  What does that mean?  At this moment, the Governor's veto stands.  Of course that does not mean that right to work zones are now allowed in the state.  Instead, this simply means that the General Assembly has not been vested with the sole authority to create right to work policies in the state.  Could Democrats try again?  Certainly.  In fact, they are already planning another vote sometime in November.

Stay tuned.  I think it is certainly likely that Democrats will find the votes to override the Governor's veto.  If that occurs, I think you will see an increased interest among pro-employer groups to try and get this case before the Supreme Court.  At that point, it might be their only hope to blunt or at least minimize the impact of this proposed law.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more