Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


A good portion of my week was spent in trial preparation and the subsequent trial.  Although I had little time to read through articles, being out of the office most of the week, there were still a couple articles I wanted to note.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Wage & Overtime Suit Brought By Current and Former Employees of Founding Farmers

Last week, several current and former employees brought suit against the company that oversees the Founding Farmers restaurants located in Maryland and D.C.  As Tim Carman at The Washington Post  indicates, this lawsuit is based in part upon claims that employees were not paid overtime wages.  Although many employees worked at different locations throughout the week (and worked more than 40 hours combined among locations), they claim the company failed to pay them overtime wages in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act.  Of course, this lawsuit was just filed last week and no answer has been filed yet.  With that being said, it will be interesting to see how this one plays out...I recall eating at one of the Founding Farmers restaurants in D.C. earlier this year with one of my sisters.  I can certainly say that I can see the need for workers at these restaurants to work more than 40 hours a week; the place was packed when we were there.


Bill to Raise Delaware's Minimum Wage Temporarily Put On Hold

Earlier this week, the Delaware General Assembly put on hold a minimum wage bill that would raise hourly minimum wage rates in the state (from its current hourly rate of $8.25/hour) to $10.25/hour in 2020.  The bill, sponsored by Democratic State Senator Robert Marshall, was tabled so that Senator Marshall could add a provision detailing how the hourly minimum wage rate will increase after 2020.  Although a similar bill was introduced last year, it failed to make it all the way through the Delaware Legislature.  Hard to say if this year will be any different, as of now, but Democrats might have the votes to make this bill a reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...