Skip to main content

Democrats Again Introduce $15/Hour Minimum Wage Legislation


Recently, Senators Bernie Sanders (an Independent who traditionally will caucus with Democrats) and Patty Murray (a Democrat) introduced legislation in the United States Senate to raise the federal minimum wage rate to $15/hour.  Readers might recall that senator Sanders introduced similar legislation back in 2015.  However, that bill failed to garner much support (let alone enough support to make it a realistic possibility that the bill would actually pass). With that being said, the bill introduced last week has the initial support of nearly two dozen Senators and has garnered a great deal of media attention (due in large part to Senator Sanders having an elevated profile and 'rock star' status among the Democratic base after his run for President).  

The bill proposes to raise the federal minimum wage rate from the current hourly rate of $7.25/hour to $9.25/hour this July, to $12/hour by 2020, and finally to $15/hour by 2024.  From that point forward, the hourly federal minimum wage rate would rise in tandem with median wage growth.

For those readers wondering what kind of chance the bill, known as the Raise the Wage Act, has of becoming law, I would caution to not hold your breath.  While Democrats have introduced this bill to great fanfare and appear to have a solid foundation of support in the Senate (and also the House where a companion bill was introduced), they are the minority party.  Of course, although the Democrats are a vocal minority in Congress, unless significant pressure can be exerted on Republicans to get the necessary votes to pass this legislation, this bill will either again fail to pass or result in a watered down version being ultimately passed (likely with a lower minimum wage increase and/or a longer phase in period).  For the time being, that might be the most realistic outcome Democrats can hope for until they regain majority control of Congress (and possess a veto proof majority so long as a Republican is in the White House).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...