Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. House Passes Overtime/'Comp Time' Bill


Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed the Working Families Flexibility Act by a 229 - 197 vote, mainly along party lines.  Under this bill, employees in the private sector who work more than 40 hours in a week would have the choice of either getting paid time and a half pay (per hour) for overtime hours worked or receive time and a half compensation time (per hour) for overtime hours worked.  This bill is not necessarily a new concept as it takes a provision offered to federal workers (since 1985) and extends it to hourly workers in the private sector.

According to the language of this bill, employers would have to opt in to implement this 'either/or' policy.  Note, however, that the choice of whether to receive overtime pay or comp time would be solely the decision of that particular employee.  If the employee chose comp time but decided later on that they would rather receive overtime pay, they could choose to 'cash out' and the employer would be required to make all salary payments within 30 days.

Republicans (who support the bill), argued this bill is necessary to give employees more freedom and discretion to choose their method of payment if they worked overtime hours.  The argument follows that working parents might prefer comp time to spend with their children, rather than getting overtime pay.  Consequently, this bill would provide these hourly workers that freedom to choose.  However, Democrats have pointed out that employers might try and strong arm employees into making a decision and employees eligible to pick between overtime pay and comp time might not actually have the flexibility this bill was intended to create.  Further, since employers normally control work schedules, they could dictate and rearrange schedules so as to minimize an employee's ability to actually earn overtime (and thus prevent employees from even having an option to pick overtime pay or comp time).

For those wondering if this bill will now become law, I caution you to hold on for a minute.  The Senate must still pass the legislation and there is no guarantee that will happen.  Keep in mind Democrats could filibuster the legislation.  As well, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not indicated his position on the issue although he has previously supported a similar measure.  Prior attempts to pass this type of overtime/'comp time' legislation have managed to pass the House only to get bogged down in the upper chamber and ultimately fail to make its way to the President's desk.  But the one difference this time?  Republicans (who are pushing this bill) have majority control of the House and Senate and the Trump Administration has indicated its support of the bill.  We are not at the finish line yet, but this bill certainly stands a chance.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more