Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. House Passes Overtime/'Comp Time' Bill


Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed the Working Families Flexibility Act by a 229 - 197 vote, mainly along party lines.  Under this bill, employees in the private sector who work more than 40 hours in a week would have the choice of either getting paid time and a half pay (per hour) for overtime hours worked or receive time and a half compensation time (per hour) for overtime hours worked.  This bill is not necessarily a new concept as it takes a provision offered to federal workers (since 1985) and extends it to hourly workers in the private sector.

According to the language of this bill, employers would have to opt in to implement this 'either/or' policy.  Note, however, that the choice of whether to receive overtime pay or comp time would be solely the decision of that particular employee.  If the employee chose comp time but decided later on that they would rather receive overtime pay, they could choose to 'cash out' and the employer would be required to make all salary payments within 30 days.

Republicans (who support the bill), argued this bill is necessary to give employees more freedom and discretion to choose their method of payment if they worked overtime hours.  The argument follows that working parents might prefer comp time to spend with their children, rather than getting overtime pay.  Consequently, this bill would provide these hourly workers that freedom to choose.  However, Democrats have pointed out that employers might try and strong arm employees into making a decision and employees eligible to pick between overtime pay and comp time might not actually have the flexibility this bill was intended to create.  Further, since employers normally control work schedules, they could dictate and rearrange schedules so as to minimize an employee's ability to actually earn overtime (and thus prevent employees from even having an option to pick overtime pay or comp time).

For those wondering if this bill will now become law, I caution you to hold on for a minute.  The Senate must still pass the legislation and there is no guarantee that will happen.  Keep in mind Democrats could filibuster the legislation.  As well, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not indicated his position on the issue although he has previously supported a similar measure.  Prior attempts to pass this type of overtime/'comp time' legislation have managed to pass the House only to get bogged down in the upper chamber and ultimately fail to make its way to the President's desk.  But the one difference this time?  Republicans (who are pushing this bill) have majority control of the House and Senate and the Trump Administration has indicated its support of the bill.  We are not at the finish line yet, but this bill certainly stands a chance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per