Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. House Passes Overtime/'Comp Time' Bill


Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed the Working Families Flexibility Act by a 229 - 197 vote, mainly along party lines.  Under this bill, employees in the private sector who work more than 40 hours in a week would have the choice of either getting paid time and a half pay (per hour) for overtime hours worked or receive time and a half compensation time (per hour) for overtime hours worked.  This bill is not necessarily a new concept as it takes a provision offered to federal workers (since 1985) and extends it to hourly workers in the private sector.

According to the language of this bill, employers would have to opt in to implement this 'either/or' policy.  Note, however, that the choice of whether to receive overtime pay or comp time would be solely the decision of that particular employee.  If the employee chose comp time but decided later on that they would rather receive overtime pay, they could choose to 'cash out' and the employer would be required to make all salary payments within 30 days.

Republicans (who support the bill), argued this bill is necessary to give employees more freedom and discretion to choose their method of payment if they worked overtime hours.  The argument follows that working parents might prefer comp time to spend with their children, rather than getting overtime pay.  Consequently, this bill would provide these hourly workers that freedom to choose.  However, Democrats have pointed out that employers might try and strong arm employees into making a decision and employees eligible to pick between overtime pay and comp time might not actually have the flexibility this bill was intended to create.  Further, since employers normally control work schedules, they could dictate and rearrange schedules so as to minimize an employee's ability to actually earn overtime (and thus prevent employees from even having an option to pick overtime pay or comp time).

For those wondering if this bill will now become law, I caution you to hold on for a minute.  The Senate must still pass the legislation and there is no guarantee that will happen.  Keep in mind Democrats could filibuster the legislation.  As well, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not indicated his position on the issue although he has previously supported a similar measure.  Prior attempts to pass this type of overtime/'comp time' legislation have managed to pass the House only to get bogged down in the upper chamber and ultimately fail to make its way to the President's desk.  But the one difference this time?  Republicans (who are pushing this bill) have majority control of the House and Senate and the Trump Administration has indicated its support of the bill.  We are not at the finish line yet, but this bill certainly stands a chance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...