Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Excuse the brevity of this post, but I am in a coffee shop in Dallas before Court this morning and the wifi is a bit spotty.  With that being said, I read some great articles this week and had a tough time narrowing down which ones I wanted to highlight.  But as we await the confirmation hearings for President Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary, I want to highlight one of the better written articles on that topic that I came across this week.

As always, below sea a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Acosta Continues to Gain Support From Labor Unions

The New York Daily News recently published an update on Alexander Acosta, President Trump's nominee for Labor Secretary.  The article notes that Acosta has recently received the support of the International Association of Fire Fighters (which follows the recent support from the Laborers' International Union of North America), something that the prior Labor Secretary nominee, Andy Puzder, failed to garner.  Of course just because a union endorses (or does not endorse) a nominee, that might not tip the balance.  But with at least some union support so far, President Trump surely must feel more confident in his nominee's chances of confirmation.


A Closer Look at the National Right to Work Bill Pending in Congress

Readers might recall that a few weeks ago, I pointed out a national right to work bill that had been presented in Congress.  While no sure thing (as prior national right to work bills have failed), with a Republican controlled Congress and a Republican President, there has been some thought that this bill could stand a shot...no matter how far off a national right to work bill might still be.  Tyrone Richardson wrote an article the other week with a bit more analysis of the bill and what to possibly expect going forward.  Well worth a read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations