Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Busy, busy week in the office.  With that being said, one of the more "light hearted" articles I came across dealt with an employment law development over in France, in regard to after hour work e-mail usage.  Is it too soon to look at getting a job with a company over there??

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Working in France? Say 'Au Revoir' to Checking Work E-mail After Hours

Interesting development in France, where employers with more than fifty employees are now required to negotiate after hours e-mail rules with their employees.  As Alyssa Newcomb over at NBC News writes, this effectively means that employees in the country can now choose to ignore work e-mails once they leave the office.  The article gives a nod to the (slim) possibility this could become a reality for workers in the U.S.   But in the meantime, we can dream, right??


EEOC Publishes Question & Answer Guide On National Origin Discrimination

Alison Curwen at SHRM wrote an article yesterday on the recent publication by the EEOC in regard to guidance on how to reduce national origin discrimination in the workplace.  For those looking for the introduction to national origin discrimination issues, this guide has it all:  From defining national origin discrimination, to how employers can avoid engaging in this type of discrimination, this guide has something for everyone.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more