Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: A Look Back Edition


On Wednesday, there was major news out of the Northern District of Texas when Judge Sam Cummings issued a permanent injunction to block the "persuader rule".  For those unfamiliar with the "persuader rule", this was a regulation pushed by the Obama administration which would have imposed significant reporting requirements that would mandate employers or consultants to disclose any arrangement to persuade employees in regard to the right to organize or collectively bargain.  It goes without saying that this is quite a development and therefore is one of the main articles I wanted to highlight this week.

As always, below are several articles that caught my eye this week.



Back in September, a temporary injunction was granted by Judge Cummings to block the "persuader rule" and the Department of Labor announced it would appeal the ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  It turns out that Judge Cummings granted a permanent injunction on Wednesday which could be the death knell for the "persuader rule" as we know it.  As Daniel Fisher over at Forbes writes, given the fact that the Department of Labor's appeal probably will not be successful with the Fifth Circuit (and might not even survive an appeal to the United States Supreme Court...which Donald Trump could influence with pro-business justices), this might be the end of the "persuader rule."

In May, I had pointed readers to a recent class action lawsuit filed against Uber in which Uber drivers claim they were misidentified as independent contractors (rather than employees), and therefore were entitled to unpaid wages.  In recent weeks, news has come from across the pond that Uber drivers in England and Wales have won the right to be classified as workers (employees) rather than self-employed contractors (independent contractors).  Natasha Lomas over at Tech Crunch details how an employment tribunal held that these Uber drivers are now entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks, and the National Minimum Wage.  Of course, Uber has indicated they will appeal...but this ruling certainly gives a glimmer of hope to Uber drivers in the U.S. who continue their fight to be classified as employees.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...