Skip to main content

This Just In: Minneapolis City Council Meeting Over $15/Hour Minimum Wage Rate Gets Heated


Earlier today, a Minneapolis City Council's Committee of the Whole hearing got a bit contentious as the Council discussed whether to put a minimum wage proposal on the November ballot to raise the minimum wage rate to $15/hour by 2022.  A group in support of the ballot initiative had collected signatures on a petition over recent months, in support of a $15/hour minimum wage rate.  

As the Committee discussed the issue, supporters of the $15/hour minimum wage rate that had packed into the Council's chambers started booing Committee members that spoke against a vote and subsequently started chanting "Let the people vote."  Throughout the session, these minimum wage advocates continually disrupted the proceedings with boos and chants, and at one point forced the Committee to adjourn briefly because of the disruptions.  The preliminary vote was 10 - 2 in support of keeping the minimum wage proposal off the November ballot.  While the Committee did not decide the issue today beyond the preliminary vote, a final decision is set for this coming Friday.

Note, that the Minneapolis City Attorney recommended late last month that the $15/hour minimum wage amendment should be left off the ballot.  In essence, the City Attorney, Susan Segal, wrote an advisory legal opinion and stated that the minimum wage increase proposal does not meet the requisite legal requirements and ultimately was an ordinance disguised as a charter amendment.  As a result, Segal stipulated that the minimum wage measure should not be on the November ballot.

Interesting to see how this plays out.  This is one of the more heated discussions that has resulted in recent memory when it comes to the minimum wage fight.  With that being said, it would not surprise me if the City Council relied upon Segal's opinion and held that the minimum wage increase proposal should not be on the November ballot.  The 10 - 2 vote today by the Committee certainly seems to indicate which way this might go.  With that being said, we'll see come Friday what the Council decides to do...



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more