Skip to main content

Today is Equal Pay Day: A Closer Look at the Issue


For those who might not be aware, today, April 12, is Equal Pay Day.  I have noted in recent months how equal pay has become a focal point on the campaign trail.  Well, at least on the Democratic side.  With that being said, given the fact that a female candidate is running for President (and could very well win in November), equal pay has taken on a heightened focus as of late.  I think it is appropriate to point readers to a few articles on the topic in order to give a little background on the topic.



Kathleen Turner (yes, that Kathleen Turner) wrote an article for the Huffington Post which highlights the extraordinary work that is still left to be done on the equal pay front.  Studies have shown that women earn on average 79 cents for every dollar that men make.  Given the long, hard struggle that it has been to get to simply get to that point, the fight is not over yet.



Readers might remember that several United States Women's soccer players filed a wage discrimination suit recently.  Alex Morgan, one of the parties to that suit, has penned an article on why she is continuing her fight for equal pay, regardless of how long it takes.



Lydia Dishman has a very well researched article on just how expansive the equal pay issue really is.  By going beyond the basic 79 cents compared to every dollar statistic that is routinely cited, Dishman points readers to a range of other factors that impacts pay, such as the age, race, and ethnicity of female workers.  Well worth a read!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more